While trying to decide who to vote for this primary season I have tried to keep an open mind. In doing so I have found myself very interested in the ideas of Republican Ron Paul. He holds a strict constructionist view of The Constitution meaning that he does not support giving any powers to the Federal Government that are not explicitly stated in The Constitution. The widespread ramifications of such a belief are potentially enormous. For instance, in the eyes of Ron Paul the Internal Revenue Service as well as the Department of Education are completely unnecessary institutions that should be dismantled. I cannot argue with his viewpoint here as the Department of Education adds needless bureaucracy when schools could be better managed at the local level by the states. The whole concept of an income tax is mentioned nowhere in The Constitution and revenues could be collected just as easily and with a lot less red tape through a national consumption tax.
While I like these ideas there is one area where Ron Paul falls short. He is anti war and thinks that the United States should withdraw its troops from all foreign locations and stop trying to be the world’s policeman. This is not necessarily a bad idea either and would save both lives and an enormous amount of money. The problem is how Ron Paul would react in certain situations. His philosophy is that unless the United States is directly threatened by another country that we should not get involved. This sounds great in theory but in reality leaves open the potential for disaster. While we are in the middle of an unpopular war in Iraq, the idea of isolationism sounds appealing. It would be nice if the United States could just bury its head in the sand and ignore the problems of the world around us, unfortunately as a superpower we cannot do that.
Read the rest of this entry »